The document emphasizes the acknowledged importance of external evaluations in the field of Preventing/Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE). It highlights the complexity of assessing the effectiveness of various P/CVE programs due to the dynamic nature of extremist scenes, changing socio-political landscapes, and diverse target groups. The need for nuanced understanding, ethical considerations, and the lack of a unified Theory of Change in program design are noted challenges. The text underscores that evaluations are crucial for making informed statements on good practices and improving professional practices in P/CVE. It also points out that while there is an increase in the number and quality of evaluations, some interventions lack evaluation or focus primarily on activities rather than assessing outcomes and broader impacts. Analytical challenges include attributing change to programming efforts, while practical challenges involve data availability and reliability.
Access the full resource here.
