The global jihadi phenomena we have been grappling with since the late 1990s contrast in form and pattern from previous forms of global terrorism. Historically, the first global terrorists were the anarchists of the end of the 19th century. But if their ideology (to destroy the “bourgeois” societies by way of “propaganda by the deed”, i.e. assassinating political leaders) was global, their deed remained, in fact, local. National police services would act rapidly to limit the impact of their actions. As such, those early global terrorists never rose to become a strategic threat. Later in the 20th century during the 1960s, most liberation movements such as the Algerian National Liberation Front (FLN), the Irish Republican Army (IRA), the Palestinian movements and the Basque ETA, among others, were bound to a specific conflict, all vowing to strike the interests of the “colonial” power both at home and abroad. This type of “liberation movement” terrorism eventually waned for political reasons: either “peace” treaties and agreements would put an end to the movement, or local populations no longer bought into the cause originally defended. Political negotiations have proven to be the best way to weaken terrorism linked to liberation movements.”
Access the full resource
Published on April 28, 2021
